The sound of piling work on the new Penang bridge can be music to the ears, given its promise of smoother traffic. WITH  the Raya exodus poised to begin over the next few days, those headed  for Penang are wont to sigh at the thought of traffic snarls in and  around the island.
There was a time when crossing from  Butterworth to George Town (and vice versa) entailed hours of sweating  in the car, waiting for slow-mo ferries to transport vehicles across the  narrow straits.
The 13.5km Penang Bridge, which opened to  traffic in September 1985, brought welcome relief as it enabled traffic  to zoom straight into Gelugor from Seberang Perai.
But over the  years, traffic has built up again, especially with the latter area  seeing a spate of growth recently. And come festive season, it’s back to  the gridlock as hordes rush to 
balik kampung.
 An artist’s impression of the new 24km link, which mirrors the existing Penang bridge in design.
 An artist’s impression of the new 24km link, which mirrors the existing Penang bridge in design.   
Well,  Penangites and visitors to the Pearl of the Orient will have to be  patient for a few more years, as the Second Penang Bridge is scheduled  to roll out only in 2013. With the new link, island-bound traffic will  be able to flow from Batu Kawan in Seberang Perai, to Batu Maung on the  other end.
The update from Penang Public Works, Utilities and  Transportation Committee chairman Lim Hock Seng is that more than 50% of  piling work on the 24km second bridge has been completed. Casting of  the segmental box girdle is in full swing and contracts for the land  road developments have been awarded.
Overall, more than 25% of  the mega project is done. It’s now time to go into full swing to make  sure that the bridge is ready by September 2013, Lim says.
“Yes,  the first Penang Bridge was expanded, but by 2012, traffic will again  exceed its capacity. Now, we have 64,000 vehicles using the bridge daily  – and that’s just one way. We’re expecting 80,000 vehicles in two  years.
“We need the second bridge to divert at least 25% of the  traffic from the first bridge. By the time the signages are ready and  the tests and trial runs conducted, it will probably only be open to  traffic early 2014.”
Lim admits that the state government does  not have any power to ensure that the project is delivered on time, but  he thinks the companies responsible will not risk having to pay  liquidated damages which could amount to “tens of thousands (of ringgit)  per day” to the federal government for any delay.
“The state  gvernment can only monitor the cost and progress closely. Any delay will  cause the cost to balloon from its estimated RM4.5bil.” Ultimately, it  will be Penangites and other motorists who will have to bear the  increase in the cost, through higher tolls, he says.
 A  UEM staff briefing Lim Guan Eng (right) at the Batu Kawan casting yard,  during an inspection by the Penang Chief Minister last year.
 A  UEM staff briefing Lim Guan Eng (right) at the Batu Kawan casting yard,  during an inspection by the Penang Chief Minister last year.  
In  June, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said in Parliament that  come 2013, the toll rate for the second bridge would be RM1.90 for  motorcycles; RM9.40 for cars, taxis and two-axle vans (except MPVs);  RM16.20 for two-axle lorries, which include pick-ups and MPVs, and  RM33.60 for vans, buses and six-wheeled lorries.
Currently, the toll for cars plying the Penang Bridge is RM7.
The  second bridge project comprises three main packages: construction of  the sub-structure by CHEC
Construction Sdn Bhd (the local arm of China  Harbour Engineering Co Ltd); casting of the segmental box girdle by UEM  Builders Bhd; and construction of the Batu Kawan and Batu Maung exit and  entry points and trumpet interchange by Cergas Murni, IJM Construction  and HRA Teguh.
Package one includes piling and the building of pile caps, columns and the navigation span.
Lim  says as of April this year, over 13% of this package has been completed  “but CHEC will have to play catch up now because of delays caused when  the company had to amend its pile caps and columns design to ensure that  they can withstand an earthquake measuring 8.0 on the Richter scale.
“Although  big vessels will not be allowed to pass under the bridge, they must  take into account the possibility of shipping accidents,” he says,  adding that dredging work is almost done. Dredging is necessary to  enable barges and machinery to access the site as the waters are too  shallow.
 Heavy machinery in operation at the bridge site at Seberang Perai.
 Heavy machinery in operation at the bridge site at Seberang Perai.  
The most difficult part of CHEC’s work is putting on the piling caps, he observes.
UEM has started casting more than 8,000 segmental box girdles and almost 20% of package two has been completed, as of April too.
As  for package three, the contractors have their hands full with  preliminary work, including setting up offices in Penang, mobilising  their machinery and conducting land surveys.
Contracts for the  construction of the toll plazas have yet to be awarded and the state has  called on all the main contractors involved to engage Penang-based  sub-contractors and to source for materials locally.
The second  bridge, which will have a lifespan of 120 years, mirrors the first in  design. Initially, there were plans for two viewing platforms, complete  with restaurants, but that was scrapped due to a lack of funds. The  platforms would have added another RM600mil to the costs.
 A  common scene as motorists head towards Penang island during festive  periods. The new link is expected to reduce traffic on the existing  bridge by about 25%.
 A  common scene as motorists head towards Penang island during festive  periods. The new link is expected to reduce traffic on the existing  bridge by about 25%.  
The cost factor has also put the brakes on additional lanes to meet increasing traffic volume, down the road.
“Just like the first bridge, additional piling must be done if we want to expand the second bridge,” Lim says.
The  first bridge has been widened from two to three lanes each way (except  for the centrespan). The third lane opened in August last year.
To  accommodate future expansion, additional piling should be done from the  start. However, the cost of putting in place piling that allows for  such expansion is equivalent to building one-and-a-half bridges, he  estimates.
In an even more ideal scenario, the foundation piling of the Second Penang Bridge should accommodate a Light Rail Transit (LRT).
“In  10 to 30 years, an LRT could prove very important, especially if we can  successfully promote the park and ride system of using public  transportation. No doubt the investment will be great but it is very  necessary,” says Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan, former State Local Government  and Traffic Committee chairman.
Dr Teng notes that Penang’s economy has been booming since the 90s, thanks to its electronics industry.
“We  were transforming from a low-capital, high-labour economy to one that  was low in human resource but high in capital investment. There was a  need for better infrastructure and amenities such as power and water  supply. Flooding problems and traffic jams had to be solved.
“Connectivity  between the island and mainland was a big concern because in case  anything were to happen on the existing bridge, it would be disastrous  for the MNCs, especially with new industrial parks in Juru and Bukit  Minyak coming up,” he explains.
It was decided that a second  bridge would be that vital link, besides being “a lifeline for the  state’s economy”. When completed, the bridge will “instil confidence in  multi-national companies to expand their existing operations in the  state, and attract new private investments,” Dr Teng says.
Initially,  a Japanese company proposed a link between Tanjung Tokong on the island  and Bagan on the mainland. It was rejected, for several reasons.
“The  Japanese proposal was for an underwater tunnel and a bridge link, but  they wanted to handle everything themselves, from the design and  contractors to the material supplies. Furthermore, the sites of the link  were already developed; we didn’t think the tunnel-bridge could add any  value to these locations,” he adds.
So the planners looked south  to Batu Maung, a relatively underdeveloped enclave compared to the rest  of the island. Across the straits, Batu Kawan looked ideal to draw  development to the south of Seberang Prai.
The proposal for the  new bridge was approved by the federal government in 2004 and  construction finally commenced on in November 2008, after months of  delay caused by land acquisition issues.
Other grouses have  surfaced since. In June this year, some 80 inshore fishermen in Kampung  Changkat voiced unhappiness that mid-sea dredging by contractors at the  second bridge construction site had affected marine life in the area.
They  claimed that their catch had dropped drastically in the last 10 years,  after the Pulau Burung sanitary landfill opened nearby. The situation  has worsened since the bridge project started, they added.
The fishermen said they could hardly make RM10 per catch daily compared to nearly RM200 per catch daily previously.
A  Fisheries Development Authority of Malaysia (LKIM) report states that  piling, dredging and landfill works, environment pollution and the  movement of ships and boats in the area have all contributed to the  dwindling catch.
State Agriculture, Rural Development and Flood  Mitigation Committee chairman Law Choo Kiang says the state government  meets periodically with the fishermen’s association, LKIM and Fisheries  Department to gather the information on this issue.
“Jambatan  Kedua Sdn Bhd (JKSB) has also been instructed to complete a Fishery  Impact Assessment and to follow every guideline set by the various  technical departments including the Department of Environment, Land  Office and LKIM and others.”
However, Law adds that dwindling  catch is also a problem worldwide and cites climate change, water and  sea pollution and lack of awareness of environmental protection as some  of the factors behind that.
He “welcomes” federal government  assistance to help with the ex-gratia payment proposed by LKIM and the  Fisheries Department for fishermen and aquaculture owners affected by  the second bridge. “We would like the federal government and JKSB to  deal with this urgently.
“LKIM and the Fisheries Department have  taken steps to alleviate the situation by placing artificial corals at  Kendi Island and Gedung Island at a cost of RM400,000. Muka Head will be  next,” he says. 
 GEORGE TOWN: The construction of the RM4.3bil second Penang bridge is  now 24% completed compared with about 7% in October last year.
A  Jambatan Kedua Sdn Bhd (JKSB) spokesman said the 24% completion covered  the works done for both package one and two of the bridge.
Package  one involves a RM2.2bil contract work on the main span, substructures  and foundation, which is expected to be completed in May 2012.
Meanwhile, package two is a RM1.55bil contract for the construction of the superstructure, scheduled for completion in 2013.
The final package involves RM350mil of land portion works, both on the island and mainland.
The  JKSB spokesman said a contract agreement signing ceremony would be held  in Kuala Lumpur on Monday between JKSB and CHEC Construction (M) Sdn  Bhd, and UEM Builders Bhd.
It is learnt that JKSB managing director Datuk Prof Ismail Mohd Taib would sign the deal on behalf of JKSB.
JKSB is a special-purpose vehicle (SPV) formed by the Government to supervise and fast track the second Penang bridge project.
It is also a concessionaire appointed to oversee the construction, management and operations of the second bridge.
Last  October, in a visit to the bridge site, Minister in the Prime  Minister’s Department Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop said the bridge  completion had to be delayed by a year to 2013 due to re-designing  works.
The 17km bridge will link Batu Kawan to Batu Maung on Penang island and will be the longest in the region when completed.