Be prepared to face hotter days

 

Experts warn of wet-bulb temperatures for those vulnerable to heatstroke 

Preparing for Extreme Heat

Tips on how to stay safe in hot weather

 As global warming ratchets up, Malaysians should prepare to face hotter and muggier days during the dry spell brought about by the annual Southwest Monsoon, say weather experts.

Along with this, it is also time to pay attention to not just dry-bulb readings provided by the typical thermometer but also wet-bulb temperatures (WBT), which scientists say are important to those who are vulnerable to heatstrokes or related ailments.

WBT is an indication of how much the air can be cooled by the evaporation of water into it and is usually measured using a thermometer with the bulb covered by a wet membrane, with higher WBT signalling an increased risk for the vulnerable.

WBT and high humidity are often missed during reporting on heatwaves, even though they play a huge role in how a person experiences heat.

Academy of Sciences Malaysia’s fellow Dr Fredolin Tangang said while the Southwest Monsoon season is usually marked by hot and dry weather, global warming could be contributing to even hotter conditions.

“According to the latest observation, the first quarter of 2025 was the second warmest year compared to the corresponding period in 2024, which was the warmest year on record.

“This despite La Nina being active during the first quarter of this year,” he said when contacted.

The APEC Climate Center in (South) Korea, he said, indicated that the surface air temperature over the Indo-pacific region is 80% above normal during the current monsoon period this year.

“Also, the sea surface temperature (SST) was forecasted to be above normal.

“High SST could drive higher relative humidity, and this increases the WBT and also the heat index, creating favourable conditions for heatstrokes,” he said.

Fredolin suggested that the relevant authorities should provide an early warning system to the public to be alert for excessive heat and humidity.

“More public announcements of the danger of heatstroke and how to avoid getting one should be regularly broadcast, while the public should not take lightly the extreme conditions that heighten the risk for heatstrokes,” he said.

A 2023 paper published by researchers from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia raised concerns about the future emergence of urban areas as hotspots for heat stress, particularly in peninsular Malaysia.

Their study showed a notable increase in the mean temperature over the peninsula, surpassing the global average, which could lead to a substantial increase in WBT, especially in dense urban regions.

According to National Antarctica Research Centre climatologist Prof Datuk Dr Azizan Abu Samah, there is a high chance the Asean region will see above-normal temperatures between June and August, based on several predictive models.

“The inter-monsoon period typically transitions into the Southwest Monsoon over the Asean region in June and will continue throughout the outlook period,” he said, while advising the people to minimise their exposure to the blistering sun as much as possible.

Meteorological Department’s (Metmalaysia) director-general Dr Mohd Hisham Mohd Anip said the main cause for current hot and humid weather is the Southwest Monsoon that began on May 10, with the phenomenon expected to continue until September.

“This monsoon typically brings dry weather to most parts of the country.

“However, thunderstorms and heavy rain may still occur from time to time,” he said.

Mohd Hisham added that the extended absence of rain over several days could result in searing conditions similar to what happened earlier this month.

On June 2, Metmalaysia issued a Level 1 heat advisory in six areas in the peninsula which experienced maximum daily temperatures of between 35°C and 37°C for three consecutive days.

Source link

Related stories:

• Tourism industry poised for rain or shine
• Malaysia at risk of deadly humidity threat

The more open the country, the more it will drive our progress: Ren Zhengfei speaks to People’s Daily

 

Ren Zhengfei photo

Recently, reporters from People's Daily (PD) engaged in face-to-face communication with Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei (Ren) on various hot topics of public interest at the company's headquarters in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong Province.

From this interaction, we genuinely felt the confidence of an entrepreneur who "unswervingly manages own affairs well."

'Moving forward step by step'

PD: Facing external blockades and suppression, with many difficulties, what goes through your mind?
Ren: I haven't thought about them; thinking is useless. Don't dwell on difficulties, just take action and move forward step by step.

PD: Huawei's Ascend chip has been "warned" about usage risks. What impact does this have on Huawei?
Ren: There are many companies in China making chips, and many are doing well; Huawei is just one of them. The US has exaggerated Huawei's achievements — the company isn't that powerful yet. We need to work hard to live up to their evaluation. Our single chips still lag behind the US by a generation. We use mathematics to compensate for physics, non-Moore's Law approaches to complement Moore's Law, and group computing to make up for single-chip limitations, which can also achieve practical results.

PD: If there are difficulties, what are the main ones?
Ren: When have there ever not been difficulties? Wasn't it difficult during the era of slash-and-burn farming? Wasn't it difficult in the Stone Age? When humans used stone tools, could they have imagined high-speed trains? China has opportunities in low- and mid-range chips, with dozens or even hundreds of chip companies working hard. 

The opportunities are even greater for compound semiconductors. For silicon-based chips, we use mathematics to compensate for physics, non-Moore's Law approaches to complement Moore's Law, and leverage cluster computing principles to meet our current needs. 

Software cannot be choked — it's built on mathematical graphic symbols, code, and advanced operators and algorithms, with no barriers. The difficulties lie in our education and building a talent pipeline. In the future, China will have hundreds or thousands of operating systems, supporting progress in Chinese industry, agriculture, healthcare, and more.

PD: There are many voices praising Huawei now, and the recognition of Huawei is very high.
Ren: When people say we're good, it puts a lot of pressure on us. A bit of criticism keeps us more clear-headed. We make products, and it's normal for people to criticize them when they use them. We allow criticism. As long as it's truthful, even if it's critical, we support it. Don't pay too much attention to either praise or criticism; focus on whether we can do our job well. If we do our job well, there's no problem.

PD: From your attitude toward difficulties and criticism, we sense you have a strong inner resolve, remaining unconcerned with praise or criticism and instead focusing on doing your own work well. This must be a key reason why Huawei has come this far.
Ren: There's still too much praise directed at us. People should pay more attention to understanding those engaged in theoretical research. Their work is profound and often underappreciated by the public, with contributions that may only be recognized after decades or even centuries. Baselessly criticizing them is detrimental to the country's long-term development. We must understand and support those doing theoretical work. We need to appreciate their vision; their great, quiet dedication is the hope of our nation. We shouldn't elevate one group while diminishing another; those engaged in theoretical research are the hope for our country's future.

'We must understand theoretical scientists with strategic patience'

PD: How to view basic theoretical research?
Ren: When our country has a certain economic strength, we must attach importance to theoretical research, especially basic theoretical research. Basic research takes more than five to 10 years; it generally requires 10 years, 20 years, or even longer. If we do not engage in basic research, it is akin to having no roots. Even if the leaves are lush and thriving, they will fall when the wind blows. Purchasing foreign products is expensive because the price includes their investment in basic research. Therefore, whether China engages in basic research or not, it will have to pay costs. The question is whether we can pay our own researchers engaged in basic research.

PD: Regarding basic research, people may not understand it and ask, "What is the purpose of this research? What benefits can it generate?" 
Ren: Scientific breakthroughs are understood by few people in the world. Those who do not understand should not evaluate them. Einstein's discovery that light rays can bend was confirmed a hundred years later. In Southwest China's Guizhou Province, there was an agronomist named Luo Dengyi. In the 1940s, when analyzing the nutritional components of fruits and vegetables, he discovered a wild fruit called thorn pear with extremely high vitamin content. At that time, China was still in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, and the social education level was very low, so few people understood his research. Later, he wrote a paper stating that thorn pear was the "king of vitamin C." Nearly a hundred years later, Guizhou developed it into a natural vitamin-rich thorn pear beverage, a luxury in the vitamin beverage market, priced at nearly 100 yuan per bottle and highly sought after. The thorn pear industry has become a channel for farmers to lift out of poverty and become prosperous. Only then did people truly recognize Luo, who had been working at a broken desk amid the flames of war.

PD: Many research achievements seem insignificant at first, but they often prove extremely useful in the end. 
Ren: Theoretical scientists are lonely. We need to have strategic patience and understand them. Tu Youyou's work on artemisinin is a case in point. So is Huang Danian, who upheld the spirit of "exploration, innovation, and sincere dedication to the country." The symbols, formulas, and thoughts in their minds can only be communicated with by a few people in the world. We must respect theoretical scientists because we may not understand their field of expertise. Society should be tolerant, and the state should support them.

PD: Basic research has a long cycle, but enterprises need to focus on efficiency. 
Ren: We invest 180 billion yuan ($25.06 billion) in research and development each year, with approximately 60 billion yuan allocated to basic theoretical research, which is not subject to performance evaluation. About 120 billion yuan is invested in product research and development, which is subject to evaluation. Without theoretical support, there can be no breakthroughs, and we will not be able to catch up with the US.

PD: This reflects a long-term perspective. It is said that Huawei has a "Chaspark." 
Ren: Huang Danian was a great scientist. Our country became aware of him during the Gulf War. The US military had a pod under its helicopter that could detect weapons buried by Saddam in the desert and destroy them accurately at the start of the war. Further investigation revealed that this pod was developed by a Chinese person — Huang's mining survey pod developed during his time at a British university, which was used as a weapon by NATO. He resigned and returned to China to become a teacher at Jilin University. He used his own money to request a 40-square-meter room from the university, opened a "Chaspark," and provided free coffee, advocating "absorbing cosmic energy over a cup of coffee." With the authorization of his family, we established a non-profit online platform called "Chaspark," which provides free access to global scientific and technological information. At the same time, it opens inclusive cooperation mechanism for basic research, collaborating with major universities and colleges. These are all strategic investments that are not subject to performance evaluation. In terms of basic theory, we have established an internal mechanism. We don't know when results will be achieved, and we don't set requirements for scientists.

'Goal of socialism is to develop society'

PD: American economists such as Richard Wolff questioned why the US has failed to develop a modern high-speed rail system like China and argued that the real issue is profitability under capitalism, noting that since high-speed rail is "not profitable," the US doesn't have it. In contrast, Wolff pointed out that while it may also not be profitable in China, the country still built it - "because the government did it." None of these are inherently profitable, but they lay the foundation for a developed society, contributing to the modernization of industry and agriculture. They reflect the social value of state-owned enterprises. For competing products, China implements marketization - allowing market competition to realize their commercial value and generate tax revenue for the society. What's your view on this?

Ren: Why is it that only socialism can take on projects that is not profitable? One of the core purposes of socialism is to advance societal development. The socialist market economy system adopted in China is a remarkable feat. When it comes to infrastructure development, we can only follow the path of the socialist market economy - otherwise, large-scale projects like high-speed railways, expressways, and dams... simply could not be built.

PD: What's your insight for the development prospects of artificial intelligence (AI)?
Ren: AI may be the last technological revolution in human society, though there might also be nuclear fusion in the energy field. The development of AI will span decades and centuries. Don't worry. China also has many advantages.
 
PD: What's your view on these advantages?
Ren: China is home to hundreds of millions of youth, who are the future of the country. Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, pointed out that the strength of a country or a nation is always underpinned by cultural prosperity. The critical technical requirement for AI lies in having ample power supply and a well-developed information network. Developing AI requires robust power guarantees. China excels in power generation and grid transmission, boasts the world's most advanced telecommunications network. The "east data, west computing" project is able to be realized.
 
PD: Any other advantages?
Ren: There's actually no need to worry about the chip issue. By leveraging methods such as superposition and clustering, computational results can match the most advanced global standards. In terms of software, thousands upon thousands of open-source software will meet the needs of the entire society in the future.

PD: How do you view China's future?
Ren: Thomas L. Friedman left our company and bought a second-class high-speed rail ticket to experience China. Later, he wrote an article titled, "I Just Saw the Future. It Was Not in America." 
 
PD: We've read that article, where he says "what makes China's manufacturing juggernaut so powerful today is not that it just makes things cheaper; it makes them cheaper, faster, better, smarter and increasingly infused with AI."
Ren: Fundamentally, algorithms are not in the hands of IT experts but in the hands of power experts, infrastructure experts, coal experts, medical experts, and various industry experts. From a practical perspective, Chinese manufacturing is adopting artificial intelligence very quickly, and it will give rise to many Chinese models. 
 
PD: What kind of support does the development of private enterprises need from the country?
Ren: A legalized and market-oriented environment where the government administers in accordance with laws and regulations. Enterprises should focus on value creation, technological breakthroughs, law-abiding operations, and tax compliance. This harmonious development model will gradually unleash economic vitality.
 
PD: How do you view openness and development?
Ren: The more open the country becomes, the more it will drive our progress. Under the leadership of the Party, with unified administration and clear policies, it is possible to gradually form a unified national market. This will surely break through all blockades and achieve great rejuvenation.


 

Photo: Screenshot from People's Daily
 

The article was originally published on the front page of the People's Daily on June 10, 2025 -By Hu Jian and Chen Jiaxing .

Source link

Decades later, Mahathir still stuck in a dilemma of his own

 

It’s okay to call for unity but to wantonly resort to make use of race and religion for political relevance is not healthy for a multi-ethnic country.

For young Malaysians unfamiliar with the nation’s political history, here’s a recap of former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s obsession with his version of Malay supremacy.

In 1970, a year after the May 13 racial riots that followed huge electoral losses for the ruling Umno-led Alliance, Mahathir authored “The Malay Dilemma”, essentially his manifesto outlining his political and racial beliefs.

It examines and analyses the make-up of the Malays and the problem of racial harmony in Malaysia. The book claims that the tolerant and non-confrontational nature of the Malays led them to fall under the dominion of others, and that the government must correct Malaysian Chinese hegemony in business.

The book was banned by the then prime minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, who felt that it threatened racial harmony. As soon as Mahathir became prime minister in his first term in 1981, he lifted the ban. 

Many times, Mahathir has labelled all non-Malays as “pendatang” (immigrants) despite most having been born and bred here, many for at least three generations. He has been unapologetic about this term, insisting that he is correct historically.

In his latest bid at wantonly promoting Malay supremacy, he is attempting to bring together all the Malay parties, including his former rivals Bersatu and PAS, while inviting Umno members to join too.

His approach appears to be rooted in a perception of threats to Malay identity and interests, which he argues necessitates a collective response from the Malay population.

Honestly, there is nothing wrong in any party trying to unite a community. It’s not just the Malays, others do it subtly too. Groups in Sabah and Sarawak are also known to use such divisive tactics for political reasons.

However, to premise his arguments on a narrative of vulnerability, suggesting that the community faces challenges from other ethnic groups, is tantamount to falsehood, in my opinion.

He has sensationalised his concerns about the erosion of Malay rights and the position of the Malay language when there is no such threat whatsoever. He knows hitting the primordial sentiments of Malays will hit the right chord.

Figures on Malays in power

Claims of erosion of Malay and Bumiputera rights is an utterly reckless claim if one cares to look deeply into who’s in charge in the public sector. This is vital because these are the people who formulate government policies and implement them.

A check with the government’s latest list of secretaries-general and directors-general will show some shocking figures – well, shocking to those who claim that Malays and Bumiputeras are losing their position. The list actually makes Mahathir’s assertions laughable.

Of the 43 top-most government officers — namely the chief secretary to the government and secretaries-general — only three are non-Malays.

Of the 107 directors-general and those of their equivalent ranks, only four are non-Malay. If you take the deputies into account, only about 5% of this total are non-Malay.

The heads of security forces and the police, their deputies and senior officers are mostly, if not all, Malays or Bumiputera. The head of the judiciary and the majority of judges are Malays or Bumiputera too.

None of the vice-chancellors in public universities are non-Malays. Government scholarships, jobs and placements in public universities stick to the quota system, although it’s not a written policy. But most Malaysians accept this reality.

Constitutional rights

The special rights of the Malays and Bumiputera are securely entrenched in the Federal Constitution, and it’s safe to say it will never ever be erased until the majority of Malays decide that they don’t need it anymore.

Claims that the DAP is trying to remove their special privileges and dilute the political power of the Malays is all hogwash. The DAP leaders themselves are seen as being more compromising these days.

All they appear to want is to remain in power to ensure there is non-Malay representation in the government. They know better not to rock the boat.

As for Islam and the royalty, they are not only untouchable, but no sane Malaysian wants to even go near these subjects. Besides the constitutional safeguards, there is enough fear among Malaysians to keep their distance.

No one in their right senses would ever want to rock this boat as they know the serious consequences that they will have to face.

The data on population growth also shows that the percentage of Malays and Bumiputera will reach a super majority in a few decades. When it reaches that stage, political battles will mainly involve Malay parties. Non-Malays will be an insignificant minority.

To argue that it’s all right for the Malays and Bumiputera to dominate the government since the Chinese control the private sector is akin to comparing apples with oranges.

The private sector generates revenue from private investment and pays taxes to help run the government. The government is mainly funded by taxpayers. They must coexist for the betterment of the nation. It is not a competition.

Election strategy

Most know that the perceived threats to the Malay community raised by Mahathir and his ilk are exaggerated or politically constructed to rally support ahead of the next general election, due by February 2028. Their goal is to bring down Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan Harapan.

Mahathir is leveraging on ethnic solidarity in an attempt to regain influence after previous electoral setbacks, including losing his deposit in Langkawi in the 2022 elections.

Mahathir is reckless in taking this approach, as such tactics can exacerbate ethnic tensions in a country that is inherently multi-ethnic, with all citizens enjoying enshrined constitutional rights pertaining to race and religion.

The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FM

Source link https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2025/06/09/decades-later-mahathir-still-stuck-in-a-dilemma-of-his-own

Related posts:

WHO IS A “MELAYU” AS EXPLAINED BY A MELAYU: Melayu by a Melayu

Dr Mahathir Mohamad, the son of an Indian migrated from low caste Kerala, has crippled Malays