Strong criticisms have emerged against the use of drones for killing people in several countries.THE  use of drones by one state to kill people in other countries is fast  emerging as an international human rights issue of serious public  concern.
This was evident in the recent session (June 18-July 6)  of the 
Human Rights Council in Geneva, both in the official meetings and  in NGO seminars.
The use of drones, or pilotless aircraft  operated by remote control, by the government in one country to strike  at persons and other targets in other countries, has been increasingly  used by the 
United States in 
Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia.
Instead  of following clear legal standards, the practice of drone attacks has  become a vaguely defined and unaccountable “licence to kill”, according  to a 2010 report of a UN human rights special rapporteur.
According to an article in 
The Guardian,  the American Civil Liberties Union estimates that as many as 4,000  people have been killed in US drone strikes since 2002. Of those, a  significant proportion were civilians.
The numbers killed have escalated significantly since Barack Obama became president.
Recent  criticisms and concerns raised by officials, experts and governments  about the use of drones include the high numbers of deaths and  casualties of innocent civilians; possible violation of sovereignty and  international human rights laws; lack of information, transparency and  accountability; their being counter-productive; and the indirect  encouragement to other countries to similarly use drone attacks.
The  
UN High Commissioner on Human Rights Navi Pillay in her overall report  to the Human Rights Council on June 18 said that during her recent visit  to Pakistan she expressed serious concern over the continuing use of  armed drones for targeted attacks particularly because it was unclear  that all persons targeted were combatants or directly participating in  hostilities.
She added that the “UN secretary-general has  expressed concern about the lack of transparency on the circumstances in  which drones are used, noting that these attacks raise questions about  compliance with distinction and proportionality.”
She reminded  the US of their international obligation to take all necessary  precautions to ensure that attacks comply with international law and  urged them to conduct investigations that are transparent, credible and  independent, and provide victims with effective remedies.
On June  26, Pakistan’s ambassador Zamir Akram told the council that his country  was directly affected by the indiscriminate use of drones, and at least  a thousand civilians, including women and children, have been killed in  drone attacks.
“The government of Pakistan has maintained  consistently that drone attacks are not only counter-productive but a  violation of international law and Pakistan’s sovereignty,” said Akram,  adding that Pakistan’s Parliament has called for an immediate end to  these attacks.
“Regrettably this call has not been heeded. The  drone attacks continue in violation of the UN Charter, international  human rights and international humanitarian law. The international human  rights machinery must clearly reject attempts to justify these  actions.”
At the council on June 16, 
Christof Heyns, the 
UN  special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions,  called for more transparency and accountability from the US, according  to a 
IPS news report.
He urged that a framework be developed and  adhered to, and pressed for accurate records of civilian deaths. “I  think we’re in for very dangerous precedents that can be used by  countries on all sides,” he said.
At an event organised by the  
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Heyns said the US drone attacks  would encourage other states to flout human rights standards and  suggested that some drone strikes may even be war crimes, according to a  report in the London-based 
Guardian.
Criticisms are also  coming from US groups and a former president. “The US has cobbled  together its own legal framework for targeted killing, with standards  that are far less stringent than the law allows,” Hina Shamsi, a  director of the ACLU told the council on June 20, according to IPS.
Shamsi  also took issue with the lack of transparency of military programmes  based on what she called “a secret legal criteria, entirely secret  evidence, and a secret process”.
“The international community’s  concern about the US targeted killing programme is continuing to grow  because of the unlawfully broad authority our government asserts to kill  ‘suspected terrorists’ far from any battlefield, without meaningful  transparency or accountability,” Shamsi told IPS.
The lack of a  legal framework allows for drone strikes to be implemented at will, in  non-conflict zones and on the basis of loosely defined terrorist  threats, without permission from the host nation, added the IPS article.
“In essence, drones cancel out national sovereignty,” Tom Engelhardt, co-author of 
Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050, told IPS. “The rules of the game are one country’s sovereignty trumps that of another.”
Former US President, 
Jimmy Carter, writing in the 
New York Times (June  24), noted that the use of US drone attacks “continues in areas of  Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen that are not in any war zone. We don’t know  how many hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed in these  attacks, each one approved by the highest authorities in Washington.  This would have been unthinkable in previous times.
“These  policies clearly affect American foreign policy. Top intelligence and  military officials as well as rights defenders in targeted areas affirm  that the great escalation in drone attacks has turned aggrieved families  toward terrorist organisations, aroused civilian populations against us  ... As concerned citizens we must persuade Washington to reverse course  and regain moral leadership according to international human rights  norms.”
Drones were originally developed to gather intelligence.
More  than 40 countries have this technology and some have or are seeking  drones that can shoot laser-guided missiles, according to a pioneering  2010 report by the then UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary  or arbitrary executions, Philip Alston.
They enable targeted  killings with no risk to the personnel of the state carrying them out  and can be operated remotely from the home state.
GLOBAL TRENDS By MARTIN KHOR
Related posts:Drones, computers new weapons of US waging shadow ...American drone wars and state secrecy! US apologizes for Chinese Exclusion Act