BEIJING  – Recently, HSBC bank released an upbeat survey predicting that China’s  currency, the renminbi (RMB), will become one of three global  settlement currencies (alongside the dollar and euro) sometime this  year. It seems that the RMB’s internationalization has been progressing  without anyone really noticing. The key remaining questions concern  whether or not the RMB will become an important international currency  anytime soon, and whether it is poised to pose a serious challenge to  the US dollar’s domination of the international monetary system.
    China has made progress in the use of the renminbi (RMB) as a settlement currency [GALLO/GETTY] 
An international currency is used and held beyond the issuing  country’s borders, and plays the role of unit of account, medium of  exchange, and store of value for residents and non-residents alike.  Certainly, there are many potential benefits for China to be gained from  the RMB’s internationalization:
·        Elimination of exchange-rate risks to which Chinese firms are exposed;
·        Greater funding efficiency for Chinese financial  institutions, thus strengthening their competitiveness in global  financial markets;
·        A boost to China’s trade with its neighbors, owing to the reduction in transaction costs;
·        Less need for China to hold US dollar assets and risk capital losses on the country’s foreign-exchange reserves;
·        Eventual status as one of the world’s major reserve  currencies, which would provide China more freedom to maneuver in  domestic and international economic policy.
China’s enthusiasm for RMB internationalization since 2009 partly  reflects its frustration with the lack of progress in reforming the  international financial architecture, and with the state of regional  financial cooperation. Chinese officials believe that RMB  internationalization is a way for China to set its own agenda without  being overly constrained by external conditions beyond its control.
Thus far, China has made significant progress in the use of the RMB  as a settlement currency, in the issuance of RMB-denominated bonds, and  in signing currency-swap agreements with foreign central banks. RMB  deposits in Hong Kong are growing exponentially.
Despite these achievements, however, RMB internationalization could  still easily go awry. For example, various incentives have been provided  to encourage enterprises to use the RMB to settle transactions. But,  with an undervalued exchange rate and strong expectations for the RMB to  appreciate in the future, foreign importers of Chinese products refuse  to use the RMB to settle transactions, while foreign exporters are happy  to accept RMB. As a result, even with the same trade balance, China  ends up with more foreign-exchange reserves, though using the RMB as a  settlement currency is supposed to reduce their accumulation.
Indeed, so far, RMB internationalization has shown a clear pattern of  asymmetry – and not only as a settlement currency for China’s imports,  but not for exports. RMB-denominated bonds meet strong demand, yet  non-residents have no great incentive to issue them. And, while foreign  lenders are happy to extend RMB loans, they are not welcome by foreign  borrowers. Given strong expectations of RMB appreciation,  internationalization will inevitably lead to a serious currency  mismatch, with possibly detrimental consequences for China’s welfare.
A more fundamental problem for RMB internationalization is what it  implies for China’s capital controls. Although the internationalization  of a currency is not tantamount to capital-account liberalization, the  degree of internationalization is conditional on capital-account  liberalization. In fact, internationalization of the RMB has opened a  new hole in China’s wall of capital controls. The big increase in RMB  deposits in Hong Kong is a case in point.
When a currency endures a prolonged process of one-way appreciation,  speculative capital aimed at exchange-rate arbitrage is bound to seek  all chances to flow in. Hot money will increase currency appreciation  pressure and complicate macroeconomic management. The profit-taking by  speculators at the end of the game will lead to huge welfare losses to  the recipient country, in this case China.
Fear of hot money was the main reason why China refused to de-peg the  RMB from the dollar until July 2005. While China did decide to allow  the RMB to appreciate gradually after that, it has relied on capital  controls to prevent hot money from flowing in. The controls are leaky,  to be sure, but they have worked (so far), which is why China has  effectively maintained macroeconomic stability over the years.
The key objective of China’s capital controls is to prevent  non-residents from holding domestic RMB-denominated assets that are  unrelated to trade and long-term capital flows. But RMB  internationalization encourages non-residents to hold more RMBs and  RMB-denominated assets. As a result of RMB internationalization, RMB  deposits held by Hong Kong residents have reached RMB370 billion ($57  billion), and the amount may reach RMB1 trillion by the end of the year.
One might wonder what difference there is between hot money and RMB  deposits held by non-residents. The answer depends on why non-residents  hold these deposits. The attraction of the RMB should come from China’s  strong economic fundamentals and faith in its economy. If it comes from  expectations of RMB appreciation, the success of RMB  internationalization can be easily reversed and will cause more problems  for China’s monetary authority to solve in the future.
Fortunately, China’s monetary authority has already noticed the  subtlety of the distinction between legitimate demand for  RMB-denominated assets and hot money. This means that the pace of RMB  internationalization could become more measured than international  investors have expected.
While internationalization of the RMB is necessary (and inevitable),  it should be guided by market principles and pursued in a cautious  manner. To get the sequence of policy adjustments right is vital. In any  case, the RMB’s path to becoming a truly international currency  promises to be a bumpy one.
By Yu Yongding, currently President of  the China Society of World Economics, is a former member of the monetary  policy committee of the Peoples' Bank of China and former Director of  the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of World Economics and  Politics.
  
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2011. www.project-syndicate.org